The Republican Revival?
Posted: November 3, 2009 Filed under: Opinion Leave a comment »So… Barely ten months into Obama’s presidency, and his approval ratings have tanked, and people are becoming disenfranchised with his policies and strategies. Rush Limbaugh stated that he viewed Obama as a ‘one-term President’ – indicating that the ‘powers that be’ are viewing Obama as a one and done President.
I can see a return to the Republicans here in the near future, but there are a couple of issues that I see with that…
First of all… Isn’t it a little early to claim a Republican victory in the next Presidential election? Shouldn’t we be waiting until at least late 2011 before we start declaring the GOP’s victory over the DNC?
Second… Maybe we should start pushing for a victory over the DNC in the 2010 elections for Congress… Which leads me to my third point…
Do we want a Republican revival? I say no. I don’t believe the Republican Party is any better than the Democratic Party right now. I personally think it would be best if we had a revolution in the Republican Party, returning to the conservative base. What good is changing from a liberal party to a slightly less liberal party?
The Survival Podcast
Posted: July 1, 2009 Filed under: Opinion Leave a comment »I’ve recently discovered The Survival Podcast (TSP) – a very insightful and realistic look at a Survival mindset.
While most ‘survivalists’ bring to mind that guy with all the guns and the hoard of food in his basement, ready to outfight everyone else when World War IV happens, the author of this podcast brings it down to a real level – true survival, not just in the case of a zombie attack… (although, if you’re ready for a zombie attack, you’re probably ready for anything that might come at you)
He breaks it down to this fundamental tenet: Be Prepared. You don’t have to live your life in fear, nor do you have to sacrifice comfort to live in an underground bunker for the rest of your life. In my opinion, this is a set of common sense principles that enable you to live better and breathe easier.
I recommend the following articles from the site to start with, so you know what it’s all about:
I’m a Conservative, but…
Posted: June 29, 2009 Filed under: Opinion Leave a comment »I was listening to a Conservative talk show the other day where a caller told the host, “I’m a Conservative, but…” and proceeded to explain why even though they’re a Conservative, they agree with raising taxes on the rich, so that the rich pay more in taxes.
First of all… if you have a flat tax, the rich DO pay more in taxes! They pay the same percentage of their income as you or I would. (I’m assuming you’re not rich. We’re under the Obama adminstration – if you are rich, you won’t be for long.)
Ok, rant off, back to the point.
Call a spade – a spade. How hard is that? If you’re a RINO or DINO (see Definition of Terms) abandon the title you carry and defect to the other side. Just don’t keep calling yourself one thing as you act like another.
You ARE allowed to change your mind on things – as long as you are doing the thinking yourself, and not allowing mass media to change your mind for you. And as long as you aren’t changing your mind as often as you change your underwear – in that case don’t be surprised if you get called a waffle or get compared to a politician who changed their rhetoric based on what people want to hear.
America – A Nation Founded on Debt
Posted: June 5, 2009 Filed under: Opinion | Tags: economy, Federal Government, State Government Leave a comment »I am a fundamental believer in States’ rights. The United States of America is a Republic of States bound together for a common cause – agreed to have a common representation in the international theatre. These States are independent ‘countries’ if you will.
This is not the point of my post, as I will come back later to the States’ rights, and the definition of a Republic versus that of a Democracy, but this is a premise that must be stated first.
Alexander Hamilton, the man that most only know as the front of a ten dollar bill, was the first Secretary of the Treasury. But he is responsible, not solely, but in an important way, for the way our economy is based today – both for the good and the bad. He had some ideas that were fundamental to the short-term survival of the Thirteen Colonies, but spelled certain doom if used for long-term economics.
It’s kind of like using duct tape to link two pipes together when you’re in a hurry to get the water running, and you don’t have either the time or the money to buy the connecting joint – you can do that by using a lot of duct tape. Eventually, however, it will start to leak and wear out. So you put some more duct tape on, and even discuss why you should actually get the right piece to fix it, but you still don’t have the resources to do it yet, and you can’t stop the running water for the time it takes to put that piece in. There comes a point where the water is flowing more and more, and the pressure in the joint is too great for duct tape to bear. Instead of taking the time when the problem is manageable, it ends up getting to the point where the pipe busts and causes a lot of flood damage in your basement, and you have no choice but to throw everything out and quite possibly have to redo the entire plumbing.
This is much like the way the economic system was founded. Shortly after gaining independence from England, the United States realized that they were missing an economic infrastructure. The states were hurting for money and resources, and without a quick and stable solution, the entire point of independence for the States would vanish quickly as there was no financial or economic support. The apparent solution to insolvency is blatant – you need money. The roadblock to the quick access to money (aka, a loan) was the countries most likely to lend the money to the US had already done so during the war and were unwilling to loan more, because the fledgling appeared to be on the brink of a financial collapse.
Hamilton’s idea was this: if the Federal Government were to loan money to the States (money that it didn’t have) then this would inspire confidence in this government from other countries… Hey, if they’re loaning out money they don’t have, then they must be ok to loan money too, right? That makes sound financial sense, right? Unfortunately, it kind of does. The individual states had the ability to develop their infrastructures if they had the financial means to do so. Then, once they developed it, they would have the ability to pay back their loans.
Now, this is where it all goes wrong. Instead of paying that debt to the countries that loaned it to the US, we ended up ‘loaning’ it out again (aka, spending it) and borrowing more. This cycle has continued nearly since the founding of this country.
Up until we no longer adhered to the gold standard, there was a sort of check to the borrowing and spending. You could only borrow as much money as there was gold to back it up. Well, we then decided to start using this concept of trust and borrowing and spending on a personal basis (the birth of the credit card). The problem was that you couldn’t extend that much money without increasing the collateral to back it up. So, we abandoned the gold standard, and instead, allowed the Federal Government to say, “Trust us, we’ll back the money up.”
Now, we come to the point where lending is stressed nearly to a breaking point. China is one of the countries that has been paying our debts to other countries, and now holds the note to our loans. The day the bill collector comes to get the money they’re due, our economy will likely come to a screeching halt – and thus, your money would be worthless, since it’s backed essentially by… nothing.
This may seem somewhat incredible or difficult to believe… but take a look at what each and every US paper currency states across the top: “Federal Reserve Note” – This is an IOU from the Federal Reserve.

$10 bill - Federal Reserve Note
The New Era of Personal Responsibility
Posted: May 6, 2009 Filed under: Opinion 1 Comment »The aftermath of the inauguration: $21 million to clean up the mess.
There were approximately 1.5 million people present at the Mall in Washington DC to witness Barack Obama’s inauguration on January 20th, 2009. These are the same people that I’ve commented on previously.
$21 million… That’s approximately $14/person… Ironically, here’s this bit from our POTUS’ inaugural speech: “What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility…”
Maybe their idea of personal responsibility is letting someone else take care of them…
You may think I’m going a little overboard on this… but here’s what the Mall looked like shortly after his speech:

Like the saying goes… A picture is worth a thousand words. So I’ll shut up now.
Earth Day
Posted: April 22, 2009 Filed under: Opinion | Tags: Climate Change, Environment, Environmental Impact, Federal Government, Global Warming, New York Times Leave a comment »Ah – this is the big day for environmentalists… Where we celebrate the Earth and Mother Nature in their entirety…
First a brief history:
Earth Day was first celebrated in 1970 of US Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin, amid concerns of over-population. Population was viewed as an important part of environmentalism (and still is, may I add).
Ironically, five months before the first Earth Day, there was mass hysteria around ‘Global Cooling’ (Yeah, hysterical, isn’t it?) and Earth Day was a way to raise awareness of this issue, per an article in the New York Times by Gladwin Hill.
In short, Earth Day 1970 (aka April 22, 1970) marked the birth of the modern environmentalist movement.
Here’s an interesting tidbit though: Back in 1970, Senator Nelson hired Denis Hayes to coordinate the events of the day, and to teach about the dangers of global cooling. Then, in 2000, Denis Hayes was again hired to coordinate events, and to teach about the dangers of global warming.
I just wish scientists could make up their minds…
Now, please don’t get me wrong. While I will likely completely mock environmentalists, mostly because of how extreme their viewpoint is (although to be honest, it’s because their viewpoint is so extremely opposite of mine), I am definitely a conservationist. I will recycle, use clean energy, etc, where it is convenient and cost-effective.
I do not agree, however, that it should be legislated or forced upon us. I do not believe that we should have the government monitor our energy usage in our homes. (I don’t have the source on this at the moment, but if I don’t feel too lazy to get it, then I may add it at a later edit)
Ok, I won’t get started on this, because this post might turn out to be waaayyy too long, otherwise, but I thought that I would just point out a few interesting points I’ve heard today…
First off, we all know that Antarctic ice is melting away, right? You know, the polar ice caps are meeelllting…! Right? Wrong! The Economic Times (India edition) cites an Australian study that was done recently, and indicates that the South Pole has shown “significant cooling in recent decades.” Essentially, one side of the ice cap is melting little by little, while the other side is freezing, little by little. It’s just freezing more than it’s melting… The ice is currently as it’s greatest density, or thickness, in 10 years. Huh. How about that. (source)
Also, according to a recent Rasmussen report: (please note that Rasmussen is considered to be one of the industry leaders in the public opinion business, polling, and all that jazz) only 1 out of 3 voters believe that global warming is caused by human activity. This is down from 47% a year ago. Nearly half believe it to be due to long-term natural trends in the planet. Shoot, it’s Earth Day, we should be celebrating Global Warming, because that’s exactly what it is, part of Earth’s natural cycle! We shouldn’t really be celebrating human initiatives to reduce it… (source)
Ah, in any case, enjoy your day. If you’ve been anxiously anticipating Disney’s new movie, Earth, enjoy that. I will admit that a few of the scenes that I’ve seen in previews seemed pretty cool. Or, maybe you’re celebrating the Administrative Professionals Day… I will most likely be celebrating the other, lesser-known official day: Today is National Jelly Bean Day!
Ironic Trivia:
- April 22nd is the birthday of J. Robert Oppenheimer – the guy in charge of the United States’ atomic bomb development team. Manhattan Project, anyone? Take that, Earth Day!
- April 22nd is also the birthday of Vladimir Lenin. In fact, the first Earth Day in 1970 occurred on his 100th birthday.
Obama’s Negative Approval Index
Posted: June 30, 2009 | Author: Darius | Filed under: News Commentary, Opinion | Leave a comment »So – it’s official. Today is the day where Obama’s approval index went negative, according to the daily Rasmussen Presidential approval poll.
In case you don’t know what that means – the number of people that disapprove of Obama is higher than the number that approve.
Here’s the Index: -2
What do you know? His approval rating is down to right around 30%…
I wonder if that has anything to do with his ineffective budget cuts or maybe because $2.6 million dollars of the “Stimulus” bill for a study to help Chinese prostitutes drink less…
Anyway, here is the beginning of disillutionment! In about 3 years, people are going to start saying to each other… I can’t believe Americans were dumb enough to elect this guy. And then they’ll elect another guy just like him.